EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w7-2495X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-2495X

24 Cores48 Thrd225 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w7-2495X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324P

32 / 64

57,127

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-2495X

24 / 48

57,133

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w7-2495X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w7-2495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 45 MB).
✅Costs $294 less on MSRP ($1,895 MSRP vs $2,189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 26.1 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $2,189 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,127 vs 57,133).

Xeon w7-2495X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($2,189 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-2495X better than EPYC 8324P?

Yes. Xeon w7-2495X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-2495X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2495X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-2495X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8324P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-2495X comes in 15.5% more expensive on MSRP at $2,189 MSRP versus $1,895 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8324P is also 15.5% better value on MSRP (30.1 vs 26.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-2495X is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w7-2495X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

Xeon w7-2495X

The Xeon w7-2495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 57,133 points. Launch price was $2,189.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-2495X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2495X — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2495X (base: 2.65 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w7-2495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Xeon w7-2495X's 57,133 — a 0% lead for the Xeon w7-2495X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 45 MB on the Xeon w7-2495X.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon w7-2495X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.8 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2.65 GHz+6%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+184%	45 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	57,127	57,133
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	35,362
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,394
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,891

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon w7-2495X supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 77.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2495X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2495X) — the EPYC 8324P offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and W790 (Xeon w7-2495X).

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon w7-2495X
Socket	SP6	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	1152 GB	2048 GB+78%
RAM Channels	6+50%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+50%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-2495X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon w7-2495X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon w7-2495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon w7-2495X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Xeon w7-2495X came in at $2189. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $2189), EPYC 8324P was $294 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 26.1 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2495X — making the EPYC 8324P the 14.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP	$1895-13%	$2189
Performance per Dollar	30.1+15%	26.1
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC 8324P on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-2495X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.