Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $588 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 280W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (61,578 vs 62,261).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.6 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌409.1% higher power demand at 280W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 25% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D scores 61,578 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+29% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 61,578 | 62,261+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 42,986 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,211 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 2048 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D was priced at $749, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX came in at $1337. On launch pricing ($749 vs $1337), Ryzen 9 9955HX3D was $588 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D delivers 82.2 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D the 55.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-44% | $1337 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.2+76% | 46.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
