EPYC 7702P
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen 9 9955HX3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen 9 9955HX3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen 9 9955HX3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7702P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+3.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,676 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 471.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (61,578 vs 63,692).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7702P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than EPYC 7702P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen 9 9955HX3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7702P
The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D's 61,578 — a 3.4% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+300% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 5.4 GHz+61% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 63,692+3% | 61,578 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702P versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7702P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 96 — 4166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7702P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702P) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) — the EPYC 7702P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D).
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+4167% | 96 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7702P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7702P was priced at $4425, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D came in at $749. On launch pricing ($4425 vs $749), Ryzen 9 9955HX3D was $3676 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — making the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D the 140.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4425 | $749-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4 | 82.2+471% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7702P and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
