PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅+3.4% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +45.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,676 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 471.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (61,578 vs 63,692).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7702P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

2025

Why buy it

✅+3.4% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +45.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,676 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 471.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (61,578 vs 63,692).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7702P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than EPYC 7702P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7702P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P is the better fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is $3,676 cheaper on MSRP at $749 MSRP versus $4,425 MSRP, and it gives you a 45.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7702P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.4% better PassMark. It is also 471.2% better value on MSRP (82.2 vs 14.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FL1 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7702P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7702P	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
1080p
low	192 FPS	287 FPS
medium	172 FPS	265 FPS
high	138 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	157 FPS	264 FPS
medium	132 FPS	221 FPS
high	101 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	183 FPS
medium	65 FPS	153 FPS
high	50 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	103 FPS

Open EPYC 7702P Open Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7702P	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
1080p
low	247 FPS	698 FPS
medium	221 FPS	601 FPS
high	183 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	376 FPS
1440p
low	202 FPS	579 FPS
medium	186 FPS	517 FPS
high	158 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	311 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	325 FPS
medium	118 FPS	294 FPS
high	103 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	218 FPS

Open EPYC 7702P Open Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7702P	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
1080p
low	629 FPS	851 FPS
medium	536 FPS	696 FPS
high	486 FPS	627 FPS
ultra	415 FPS	539 FPS
1440p
low	524 FPS	680 FPS
medium	446 FPS	557 FPS
high	394 FPS	490 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	416 FPS
4K
low	389 FPS	484 FPS
medium	312 FPS	401 FPS
high	274 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	302 FPS

Open EPYC 7702P Open Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7702P	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
1080p
low	904 FPS	1080 FPS
medium	823 FPS	976 FPS
high	706 FPS	854 FPS
ultra	610 FPS	768 FPS
1440p
low	711 FPS	853 FPS
medium	620 FPS	753 FPS
high	530 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	571 FPS
4K
low	503 FPS	622 FPS
medium	452 FPS	557 FPS
high	398 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	426 FPS

Open EPYC 7702P Open Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7702P and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

EPYC 7702P

The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D's 61,578 — a 3.4% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+300%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	5.4 GHz+61%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025)
PassMark	63,692+3%	61,578

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702P versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7702P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 96 — 190.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7702P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702P) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) — the EPYC 7702P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D).

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Socket	TR4	FL1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	5600+75%
Max RAM Capacity	4096+4167%	96
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7702P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	AMD Radeon 610M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7702P launched at $4425 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D debuted at $749. On MSRP ($4425 vs $749), the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is $3676 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — making the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D the 140.4% better value option.