Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 7702P

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2019
Threadripper family
·
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7702P
64 / 128
63,692
+1.2%
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9900X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32 / 64
62,946
0.0%
brand logoRyzen AI 9 HX 370
brand logoRyzen AI Max 390
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9955HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low192 FPS
medium172 FPS
high138 FPS
ultra110 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low270 FPS
medium222 FPS
high183 FPS
ultra131 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low247 FPS
medium221 FPS
high183 FPS
ultra148 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low806 FPS
medium681 FPS
high528 FPS
ultra457 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low629 FPS
medium536 FPS
high486 FPS
ultra415 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low1025 FPS
medium927 FPS
high862 FPS
ultra765 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low904 FPS
medium823 FPS
high706 FPS
ultra610 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low1325 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high1073 FPS
ultra875 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low292 FPS
medium221 FPS
high203 FPS
ultra183 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low326 FPS
medium247 FPS
high225 FPS
ultra202 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low297 FPS
medium262 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra162 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low345 FPS
medium306 FPS
high244 FPS
ultra207 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low307 FPS
medium275 FPS
high255 FPS
ultra208 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low367 FPS
medium327 FPS
high284 FPS
ultra242 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 7702P
low230 FPS
medium203 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra159 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low286 FPS
medium266 FPS
high224 FPS
ultra210 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
  • ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • ✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($4,425 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
  • ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +50.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (62,946 vs 63,692).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ❌
    1.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,491 MSRPvs$4,425 MSRP
  • ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7702P better than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is ahead with a 50.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7702P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7702P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7702P comes in $66 cheaper on MSRP at $4,425 MSRP versus $4,491 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 50.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.7% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7702P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7702P

The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.

FeatureEPYC 7702PRyzen Threadripper 3970X
Cores / Threads
64 / 128+100%
32 / 64
Boost Clock
3.35 GHz
4.5 GHz+34%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+100%
128 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
63,692+1%
62,946
Cinebench R23 Multi
—
44,510
Geekbench 6 Single
—
1,664
Geekbench 6 Multi
—
13,739
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the TR4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7702P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7702P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702P) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) — the EPYC 7702P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).

FeatureEPYC 7702PRyzen Threadripper 3970X
Socket
TR4
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+1500%
256 GB
RAM Channels
8+100%
4
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.

FeatureEPYC 7702PRyzen Threadripper 3970X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7702P was priced at $4425, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($4425 vs $4491), EPYC 7702P was $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — making the EPYC 7702P the 2.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7702PRyzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP
$4425-1%
$4491
Performance per Dollar
14.4+3%
14.0
Release Date
2019
2019
Search EPYC 7702P on AmazonSearch Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.