EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
EPYC 7702P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7702P
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($4,425) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($4,425) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7702P and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
EPYC 7702P
The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 4.5 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+85% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 63,692+1% | 62,946 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 44,510 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,664 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,739 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the TR4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — the EPYC 7702P supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7702P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7702P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702P) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) — the EPYC 7702P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+79900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 256 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7702P launched at $4425 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X debuted at $4491.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4425-1% | $4491 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $4491 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7702P and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
