EPYC 7702P vs EPYC 9175F
EPYC 7702P
EPYC 9175F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7702P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,425) | ✅ More affordable ($3,703) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+24%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,425) | ✅ More affordable ($3,703) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7702P and EPYC 9175F
EPYC 7702P
The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9175F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F — a 39.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9175F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the EPYC 9175F's 65,894 — a 3.4% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+300% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 5 GHz+49% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+110% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 512 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 63,692 | 65,894+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9175F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702P versus 6400 on the EPYC 9175F — the EPYC 9175F supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7702P) vs 12 (EPYC 9175F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and SP5 (EPYC 9175F).
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9175F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7702P launched at $4425 MSRP, while the EPYC 9175F debuted at $4256.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4425 | $4256-4% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $3703 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7702P and EPYC 9175F
