EPYC 7702P vs Xeon w7-3465X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7702P

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3465X

28 Cores56 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon w7-3465X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7702P

64 / 128

63,692

+1.6%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3465X

28 / 56

62,663

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon w7-3465X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon w7-3465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+241.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 75 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3465X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3465X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3465X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,536 less on MSRP ($2,889 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($2,889 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (62,663 vs 63,692).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (75 MB vs 256 MB).
❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3465X better than EPYC 7702P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w7-3465X is ahead with a 20.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. EPYC 7702P also has the bigger cache pool with 241.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 75 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 241.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 75 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3465X is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-3465X comes in $1,536 cheaper on MSRP at $2,889 MSRP versus $4,425 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7702P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. It is also 50.7% better value on MSRP (21.7 vs 14.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3465X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon w7-3465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7702P

The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

Xeon w7-3465X

The Xeon w7-3465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,663 points. Launch price was $2,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w7-3465X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3465X — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3465X (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the Xeon w7-3465X's 62,663 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon w7-3465X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+129%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	4.8 GHz+43%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+241%	75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	63,692+2%	62,663
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,959
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,351

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3465X — the Xeon w7-3465X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3465X) — the EPYC 7702P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3465X).

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon w7-3465X
Socket	TR4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3465X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-3465X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P) vs true (Xeon w7-3465X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon w7-3465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon w7-3465X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7702P was priced at $4425, while the Xeon w7-3465X came in at $2889. On launch pricing ($4425 vs $2889), Xeon w7-3465X was $1536 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3465X — making the Xeon w7-3465X the 40.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP	$4425	$2889-35%
Performance per Dollar	14.4	21.7+51%
Release Date	2019	2023

Search EPYC 7702P on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3465X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.