EPYC 4564P
EPYC 7702P
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 7702P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 7702P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 7702P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4564P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,908 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 194.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 200W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
EPYC 7702P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (63,692 vs 64,387).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4564P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4564P better than EPYC 7702P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 7702P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.
EPYC 7702P
The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4564P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7702P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P — a 51.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7702P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the EPYC 7702P's 63,692 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 4564P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 64 / 128+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+70% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+125% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 64,387+1% | 63,692 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,975 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,581 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7702P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus 3200 on the EPYC 7702P — the EPYC 4564P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7702P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 8 (EPYC 7702P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 128 (EPYC 7702P) — the EPYC 7702P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and SP3 (EPYC 7702P).
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+63% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4564P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7702P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Server / Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4564P was priced at $1517, while the EPYC 7702P came in at $4425. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $4425), EPYC 4564P was $2908 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7702P — making the EPYC 4564P the 98.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-66% | $4425 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.4+194% | 14.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4564P and EPYC 7702P
