EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w9-3475X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4564P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3475X

36 Cores72 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w9-3475X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4564P

16 / 32

64,387

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w9-3475X

36 / 72

65,077

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w9-3475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w9-3475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4564P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,222 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Delivers 143.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon w9-3475X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,581 vs 44,869).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 83 MB).

Xeon w9-3475X

2023

Why buy it

✅+141.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+28.9% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 64 MB).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4564P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4564P better than Xeon w9-3475X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4564P is ahead with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X pulls ahead with 141.5% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon w9-3475X also has the bigger cache pool with 28.9% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X is the stronger fit. You are getting 141.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.9% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4564P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4564P comes in $2,222 cheaper on MSRP at $1,517 MSRP versus $3,739 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon w9-3475X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 141.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 143.9% better value on MSRP (42.4 vs 17.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4564P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w9-3475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4564P

The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon w9-3475X

The Xeon w9-3475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,077 points. Launch price was $3,739.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4564P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w9-3475X offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon w9-3475X has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3475X — a 17.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the Xeon w9-3475X's 65,077 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon w9-3475X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,975 vs 1,814, a 48.5% lead for the EPYC 4564P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,581 vs 44,869 (82.9% advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 4564P	Xeon w9-3475X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	36 / 72+125%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+19%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.5 GHz+105%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	82.5 MB+29%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	64,387	65,077+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	38,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,975+64%	1,814
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,581	44,869+141%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3475X — the EPYC 4564P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3475X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3475X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3475X) — the Xeon w9-3475X offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and W790 (Xeon w9-3475X).

Feature	EPYC 4564P	Xeon w9-3475X
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+8%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	112+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w9-3475X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs true (Xeon w9-3475X). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w9-3475X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon w9-3475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 4564P	Xeon w9-3475X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	true
Target Use	High-end Server / Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4564P was priced at $1517, while the Xeon w9-3475X came in at $3739. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $3739), EPYC 4564P was $2222 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3475X — making the EPYC 4564P the 83.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4564P	Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP	$1517-59%	$3739
Performance per Dollar	42.4+144%	17.4
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 4564P on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.