EPYC 4564P
Xeon w7-2595X
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w7-2595X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w7-2595X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w7-2595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4564P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 49 MB).
- ✅Costs $522 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 250W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (38,500 vs 48,442).
Xeon w7-2595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+25.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4564P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4564P better than Xeon w7-2595X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon w7-2595X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.
Xeon w7-2595X
The Xeon w7-2595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 48.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 66,049 points. Launch price was $2,039.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4564P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-2595X offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon w7-2595X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2595X — a 17.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the Xeon w7-2595X's 66,049 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon w7-2595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,500 vs 48,442 (22.9% advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,975 vs 2,436, a 19.9% lead for the EPYC 4564P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,581 vs 21,758 (15.8% advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 48.75 MB on the Xeon w7-2595X.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 26 / 52+63% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+19% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+61% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+31% | 48.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 64,387 | 66,049+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,500 | 48,442+26% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,975+22% | 2,436 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,581 | 21,758+17% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-2595X — the EPYC 4564P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-2595X supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2595X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2595X) — the Xeon w7-2595X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and W790 (Xeon w7-2595X).
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+8% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-2595X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs true (Xeon w7-2595X). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w7-2595X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon w7-2595X rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | true |
| Target Use | High-end Server / Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4564P was priced at $1517, while the Xeon w7-2595X came in at $2039. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $2039), EPYC 4564P was $522 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2595X — making the EPYC 4564P the 26.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-26% | $2039 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.4+31% | 32.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4564P and Xeon w7-2595X
