EPYC 75F3
EPYC 4564P
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4564P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4564P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4564P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 75F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4564P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4564P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4564P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,866 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 254.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (64,387 vs 64,505).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4564P better than EPYC 75F3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4564P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 4564P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P — a 35.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 2.95 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 4564P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 4564P's 64,387 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4564P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.95 GHz | 4.5 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 64,505 | 64,387 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,975 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,581 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 4564P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P — the EPYC 4564P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 2 (EPYC 4564P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 28 (EPYC 4564P) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P).
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4564P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+2033% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4564P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 75F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4564P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | High-end Server / Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the EPYC 4564P came in at $1517. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $1517), EPYC 4564P was $3866 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4564P — making the EPYC 4564P the 111.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4564P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383 | $1517-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0 | 42.4+253% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 4564P
