EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon 6520P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 75F3

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6520P

24 Cores48 Thrd210 WWMax: 4 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon 6520P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 75F3

32 / 64

64,505

+0.8%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon 6520P

24 / 48

64,010

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon 6520P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon 6520P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6520P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6520P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,088 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 312.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (64,010 vs 64,505).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 75F3 better than Xeon 6520P?

Yes. EPYC 75F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 75F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 75F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6520P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 75F3 comes in 315.7% more expensive on MSRP at $5,383 MSRP versus $1,295 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6520P is also 312.5% better value on MSRP (49.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6520P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon 6520P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

Xeon 6520P

The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6520P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6520P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the Xeon 6520P's 64,010 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.95 GHz+23%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+78%	144 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	64,505	64,010
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6520P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P — the Xeon 6520P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 102300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 88 (Xeon 6520P) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 TB+102300%	4 TB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6520P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the Xeon 6520P came in at $1295. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $1295), Xeon 6520P was $4088 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 49.4 pts/$ for the Xeon 6520P — making the Xeon 6520P the 121.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Xeon 6520P
MSRP	$5383	$1295-76%
Performance per Dollar	12.0	49.4+312%
Release Date	2021	2025

Search EPYC 75F3 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6520P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.