EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

CPU

GPU

EPYC 75F3

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 Cores48 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Threadripper Pro family

···

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Performance Spectrum

EPYC 75F3

32 / 64

64,505

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 / 48

66,614

+3.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (64,505 vs 66,614).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,984 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 131.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than EPYC 75F3?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 40.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 40.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX comes in $2,984 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $5,383 MSRP, and it still gives you a 40.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 131.7% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 2.95 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 3.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.95 GHz	3.8 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	64,505	66,614+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	45,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,550
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Socket	SP3	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+100%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX came in at $2399. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $2399), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was $2984 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 79.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP	$5383	$2399-55%
Performance per Dollar	12.0	27.8+132%
Release Date	2021	2022

Search EPYC 75F3 on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.