EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 8434P
EPYC 75F3
EPYC 8434P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 75F3
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8434P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,799) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,137) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+9%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,799) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,137) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 8434P
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
EPYC 8434P
The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 8434P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P — a 25.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 75F3 (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 8434P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 8434P's 66,490 — a 3% lead for the EPYC 8434P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+29% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.95 GHz+18% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 64,505 | 66,490+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8434P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8434P — the EPYC 8434P supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 6 (EPYC 8434P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 96 (EPYC 8434P) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and SP6 (EPYC 8434P).
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+256% | 1152 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8434P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the EPYC 8434P debuted at $1517. At current prices ($2799 vs $3137), the EPYC 75F3 is $338 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 23.0 pts/$ vs 21.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 8434P — making the EPYC 75F3 the 8.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383 | $1517-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2799-11% | $3137 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0+8% | 21.2 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 8434P
