EPYC 75F3
EPYC 4565P
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4565P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4565P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4565P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 75F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4565P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4565P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,653 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.5 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (64,068 vs 64,505).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4565P better than EPYC 75F3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4565P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
EPYC 4565P
The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.
Processing Power
The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 4565P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P — a 35.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 2.95 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 4565P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 4565P's 64,068 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.95 GHz | 4.3 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 64,505 | 64,068 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 4565P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus 5600 on the EPYC 4565P — the EPYC 4565P supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 2 (EPYC 4565P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 28 (EPYC 4565P) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and AM5 (EPYC 4565P).
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+2033% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4565P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4565P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 75F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the EPYC 4565P came in at $2730. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $2730), EPYC 4565P was $2653 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 23.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 4565P — making the EPYC 4565P the 64.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383 | $2730-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0 | 23.5+96% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 4565P
