EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 4565P
EPYC 75F3
EPYC 4565P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 75F3
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4565P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,799) | ✅ More affordable ($1,980) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) | ✨ Modern (Grado (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+40%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,799) | ✅ More affordable ($1,980) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 4565P
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
EPYC 4565P
The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.
Processing Power
The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 4565P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P — a 35.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 2.95 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 4565P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 4565P's 64,068 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.95 GHz | 4.3 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 64,505 | 64,068 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 4565P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus 5600 on the EPYC 4565P — the EPYC 4565P supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 2 (EPYC 4565P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 28 (EPYC 4565P) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and AM5 (EPYC 4565P).
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+2033% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4565P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4565P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 75F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the EPYC 4565P debuted at $2730. At current prices ($2799 vs $1980), the EPYC 4565P is $819 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 23.0 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4565P — making the EPYC 4565P the 33.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 4565P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383 | $2730-49% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2799 | $1980-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0 | 32.4+41% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 4565P
