EPYC 75F3
EPYC 9254
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9254 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9254 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9254: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 75F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9254 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9254 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9254
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,622 less on MSRP ($3,761 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.1 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($3,761 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (64,344 vs 64,505).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9254 better than EPYC 75F3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9254 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9254 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 — a 3.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9254 (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9254 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 9254's 64,344 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.15 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.95 GHz+2% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 64,505 | 64,344 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,233 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,023 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9254 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 — the EPYC 9254 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 12 (EPYC 9254). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and SP5 (EPYC 9254).
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 6144 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9254 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9254). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the EPYC 9254 came in at $3761. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $3761), EPYC 9254 was $1622 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9254 — making the EPYC 9254 the 35.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383 | $3761-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0 | 17.1+43% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9254
