EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9334

CPU

GPU

EPYC 75F3

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9334

32 Cores64 Thrd210 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9334 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 75F3

32 / 64

64,505

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9334

32 / 64

65,568

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9334 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (64,505 vs 65,568).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,393 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9334 better than EPYC 75F3?

Yes. EPYC 9334 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9334 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9334 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9334 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9334 comes in $2,393 cheaper on MSRP at $2,990 MSRP versus $5,383 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 83.0% better value on MSRP (21.9 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9334 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 9334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9334 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 75F3 (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	4 GHz+3%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.95 GHz+9%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	64,505	65,568+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9334 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9334 — the EPYC 9334 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 12 (EPYC 9334). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the EPYC 9334 came in at $2990. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $2990), EPYC 9334 was $2393 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the EPYC 9334 the 58.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 75F3	EPYC 9334
MSRP	$5383	$2990-44%
Performance per Dollar	12.0	21.9+82%
Release Date	2021	2022

Search EPYC 75F3 on Amazon

Search EPYC 9334 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.