Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7702P

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 75F3

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 7702P

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7702P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 75F3
32 / 64
64,505
+1.3%
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen AI Max PRO 390
brand logoRyzen 9 7900X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
EPYC 7702P
64 / 128
63,692
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9900X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7702P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low198 FPS
medium161 FPS
high130 FPS
ultra100 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low192 FPS
medium172 FPS
high138 FPS
ultra110 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low507 FPS
medium443 FPS
high354 FPS
ultra288 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low247 FPS
medium221 FPS
high183 FPS
ultra148 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low948 FPS
medium792 FPS
high734 FPS
ultra657 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low629 FPS
medium536 FPS
high486 FPS
ultra415 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low1006 FPS
medium908 FPS
high782 FPS
ultra679 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low904 FPS
medium823 FPS
high706 FPS
ultra610 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low292 FPS
medium221 FPS
high203 FPS
ultra183 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low250 FPS
medium222 FPS
high175 FPS
ultra141 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low297 FPS
medium262 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra162 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low323 FPS
medium289 FPS
high268 FPS
ultra231 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low307 FPS
medium275 FPS
high255 FPS
ultra208 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low239 FPS
medium211 FPS
high180 FPS
ultra168 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7702P
low230 FPS
medium203 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra159 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7702P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
    • ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

    EPYC 7702P

    2019

    Why buy it

    • ✅Costs $958 less on MSRP ($4,425 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
    • ✅Delivers 20.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
    • ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (63,692 vs 64,505).

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 75F3 better than EPYC 7702P?
    Yes. EPYC 75F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, EPYC 75F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 75F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 75F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7702P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 75F3 comes in 21.6% more expensive on MSRP at $5,383 MSRP versus $4,425 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7702P is also 20.1% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 75F3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

    EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7702P Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 75F3

    The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

    AMD

    EPYC 7702P

    The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7702P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P — a 17.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 75F3 (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7702P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 7702P's 63,692 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 75F3. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureEPYC 75F3EPYC 7702P
    Cores / Threads
    32 / 64
    64 / 128+100%
    Boost Clock
    4 GHz+19%
    3.35 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.95 GHz+48%
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    256 MB (total)
    256 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (per core)
    512K (per core)
    Process
    7 nm+
    7 nm, 14 nm
    Architecture
    Milan (2021−2023)
    Zen 2 (2017−2020)
    PassMark
    64,505+1%
    63,692
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7702P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and SP3 (EPYC 7702P).

    FeatureEPYC 75F3EPYC 7702P
    Socket
    SP3
    TR4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    3200
    3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    4096
    4096
    RAM Channels
    8
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

    FeatureEPYC 75F3EPYC 7702P
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    VT-x, VT-d
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the EPYC 7702P came in at $4425. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $4425), EPYC 7702P was $958 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7702P — making the EPYC 7702P the 18.3% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 75F3EPYC 7702P
    MSRP
    $5383
    $4425-18%
    Performance per Dollar
    12.0
    14.4+20%
    Release Date
    2021
    2019
    Search EPYC 75F3 on AmazonSearch EPYC 7702P on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.