
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 9175F

EPYC 4564P

EPYC 9175F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4564P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,517) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+139%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,517) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4564P and EPYC 9175F

EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.

EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4564P and EPYC 9175F share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F — a 13.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9175F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the EPYC 9175F's 65,894 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+14% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+7% | 4.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 512 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 64,387 | 65,894+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,975 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,581 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9175F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus 6400 on the EPYC 9175F — the EPYC 9175F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 12 (EPYC 9175F). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 128 (EPYC 9175F) — the EPYC 9175F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and SP5 (EPYC 9175F).
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+4915100% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9175F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Server / Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4564P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the EPYC 9175F debuted at $4256. At current prices ($1517 vs $3703), the EPYC 4564P is $2186 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9175F — making the EPYC 4564P the 81.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-64% | $4256 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1517-59% | $3703 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.4+138% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















