EPYC 4564P
EPYC 9175F
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 9175F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 9175F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 9175F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4564P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,739 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 320W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9175F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (64,387 vs 65,894).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 512 MB).
EPYC 9175F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4564P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4564P better than EPYC 9175F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 9175F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4564P and EPYC 9175F share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F — a 13.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9175F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the EPYC 9175F's 65,894 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+14% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+7% | 4.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 512 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 64,387 | 65,894+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,975 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,581 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9175F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus 6400 on the EPYC 9175F — the EPYC 9175F supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 12 (EPYC 9175F). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 128 (EPYC 9175F) — the EPYC 9175F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and SP5 (EPYC 9175F).
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 6400+23% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9175F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Server / Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4564P was priced at $1517, while the EPYC 9175F came in at $4256. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $4256), EPYC 4564P was $2739 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 15.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9175F — making the EPYC 4564P the 93.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-64% | $4256 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.4+174% | 15.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4564P and EPYC 9175F
