EPYC 4564P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
EPYC 4564P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4564P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4564P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4564P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+91.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $882 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (38,500 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+16.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,550 vs 2,975).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 4564P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4564P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4564P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4564P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4564P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 23.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 3.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,500 vs 45,000 (15.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,975 vs 1,550, a 63% lead for the EPYC 4564P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,581 vs 15,500 (18.1% advantage for the EPYC 4564P). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+27% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+18% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 64,387 | 66,614+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,500 | 45,000+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,975+92% | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,581+20% | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 4564P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4564P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Server / Workstation | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4564P was priced at $1517, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX came in at $2399. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $2399), EPYC 4564P was $882 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the EPYC 4564P the 41.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-37% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.4+53% | 27.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4564P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
