EPYC 4564P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
EPYC 4564P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4564P
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,517) | ✅ More affordable ($225) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+598%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,517) | ✅ More affordable ($225) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4564P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4564P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 23.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 3.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,500 vs 45,000 (15.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,975 vs 1,550, a 63% lead for the EPYC 4564P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,581 vs 15,500 (18.1% advantage for the EPYC 4564P). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+27% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+18% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 64,387 | 66,614+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,500 | 45,000+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,975+92% | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,581+20% | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 4564P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4564P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Server / Workstation | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4564P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. At current prices ($1517 vs $225), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $1292 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 296.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 149.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-37% | $2399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1517 | $225-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.4 | 296.1+598% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4564P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
