Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 8434P

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 4564P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 8434P

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023
EPYC family
····
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 8434P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4564P
16 / 32
64,387
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HX
brand logoRyzen 9 7900X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
EPYC 8434P
48 / 96
66,490
+3.3%
brand logoRyzen 7 9700X
brand logoRyzen 9 5900XT
brand logoRyzen 9 9850HX
brand logoRyzen 9 7945HX3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 8434P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low289 FPS
medium262 FPS
high216 FPS
ultra183 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low159 FPS
medium131 FPS
high110 FPS
ultra87 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low771 FPS
medium632 FPS
high469 FPS
ultra397 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low419 FPS
medium369 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra236 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low1025 FPS
medium1139 FPS
high1058 FPS
ultra875 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low860 FPS
medium786 FPS
high760 FPS
ultra682 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low1294 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high982 FPS
ultra855 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low1023 FPS
medium913 FPS
high772 FPS
ultra651 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low335 FPS
medium256 FPS
high223 FPS
ultra190 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low319 FPS
medium244 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra186 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low307 FPS
medium262 FPS
high203 FPS
ultra162 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low254 FPS
medium222 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra136 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low387 FPS
medium347 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra256 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low316 FPS
medium286 FPS
high265 FPS
ultra215 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 4564P
low312 FPS
medium296 FPS
high252 FPS
ultra234 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8434P
low244 FPS
medium214 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra166 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 8434P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4564P

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +36.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Draws 170W instead of 200W, a 30W reduction.
  • ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 8434P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (64,387 vs 66,490).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).

EPYC 8434P

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+3.3% higher PassMark.
  • ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
  • ✅242.9% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌17.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 170W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4564P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4564P better than EPYC 8434P?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4564P is ahead with a 36.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8434P pulls ahead with 3.3% better PassMark. EPYC 8434P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8434P is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4564P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8434P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4564P comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $1,517 MSRP versus $1,517 MSRP, and it still gives you a 36.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 8434P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.3% better PassMark. EPYC 8434P is also 3.3% better value on MSRP (43.8 vs 42.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4564P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 8434P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4564P

The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

EPYC 8434P

The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4564P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 8434P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P — a 59.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 8434P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the EPYC 8434P's 66,490 — a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 8434P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P.

FeatureEPYC 4564PEPYC 8434P
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
48 / 96+200%
Boost Clock
5.7 GHz+84%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
4.5 GHz+80%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
128 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
5 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
64,387
66,490+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
38,500
—
Geekbench 6 Single
2,975
—
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,581
—
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8434P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus 4800 on the EPYC 8434P — the EPYC 4564P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8434P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 6 (EPYC 8434P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 96 (EPYC 8434P) — the EPYC 8434P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and SP6 (EPYC 8434P).

FeatureEPYC 4564PEPYC 8434P
Socket
AM5
SP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200+8%
4800
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
1152 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
96+243%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8434P). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 8434P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

FeatureEPYC 4564PEPYC 8434P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-end Server / Workstation
—
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4564P was priced at $1517, while the EPYC 8434P came in at $1517. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $1517), EPYC 8434P was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 43.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 8434P — making the EPYC 8434P the 3.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4564PEPYC 8434P
MSRP
$1517
$1517
Performance per Dollar
42.4
43.8+3%
Release Date
2024
2023
Search EPYC 4564P on AmazonSearch EPYC 8434P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.