EPYC 4564P
Xeon 6520P
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon 6520P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon 6520P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon 6520P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4564P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 210W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6520P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,581 vs 25,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
Xeon 6520P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+34.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Costs $222 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4564P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4564P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6520P better than EPYC 4564P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4564P vs Xeon 6520P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4564P
The EPYC 4564P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,387 points. Launch price was $699.
Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4564P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6520P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon 6520P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4564P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P — a 35.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4564P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4564P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6520P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4564P scores 64,387 against the Xeon 6520P's 64,010 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 4564P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,975 vs 1,900, a 44.1% lead for the EPYC 4564P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,581 vs 25,000 (29.5% advantage for the Xeon 6520P). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4564P vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+43% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+88% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 144 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 64,387 | 64,010 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,975+57% | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,581 | 25,000+35% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4564P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6520P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4564P versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P — the Xeon 6520P supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6520P supports up to 4 TB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4564P) vs 8 (Xeon 6520P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4564P) vs 88 (Xeon 6520P) — the Xeon 6520P offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (EPYC 4564P) and FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P).
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6400+23% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4 TB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 88+214% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4564P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6520P). The EPYC 4564P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6520P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4564P targets High-end Server / Workstation, Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4564P rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Server / Workstation | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4564P was priced at $1517, while the Xeon 6520P came in at $1295. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $1295), Xeon 6520P was $222 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4564P delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 49.4 pts/$ for the Xeon 6520P — making the Xeon 6520P the 15.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4564P | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517 | $1295-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.4 | 49.4+17% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4564P and Xeon 6520P
