EPYC 7543
EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7543 vs EPYC 7702P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7543 vs EPYC 7702P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7543 vs EPYC 7702P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7543
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,952 vs 63,692).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($10,257 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
EPYC 7702P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $5,832 less on MSRP ($4,425 MSRP vs $10,257 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 134.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $10,257 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7702P better than EPYC 7543?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7543 vs EPYC 7702P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7543
The EPYC 7543 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,952 points. Launch price was $3,761.
EPYC 7702P
The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7543 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7702P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P — a 9.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 7543 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7543 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7702P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7543 scores 62,952 against the EPYC 7702P's 63,692 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 7702P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7543 | EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 128+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+10% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 62,952 | 63,692+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7543 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7702P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7543) and SP3 (EPYC 7702P).
| Feature | EPYC 7543 | EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7543 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 7543 | EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7543 was priced at $10257, while the EPYC 7702P came in at $4425. On launch pricing ($10257 vs $4425), EPYC 7702P was $5832 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7543 delivers 6.1 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7702P — making the EPYC 7702P the 80.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7543 | EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10257 | $4425-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 14.4+136% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7543 and EPYC 7702P
