EPYC 75F3
EPYC 7543
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7543 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7543 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7543: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 75F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,874 less on MSRP ($5,383 MSRP vs $10,257 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $10,257 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
EPYC 7543
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,952 vs 64,505).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($10,257 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 75F3 better than EPYC 7543?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7543 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
EPYC 7543
The EPYC 7543 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,952 points. Launch price was $3,761.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7543 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 75F3 (base: 2.95 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm+ process. In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the EPYC 7543's 62,952 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 75F3. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 7543 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.95 GHz+5% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 64,505+2% | 62,952 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and SP3 (EPYC 7543).
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 7543 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7543 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 7543 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the EPYC 7543 came in at $10257. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $10257), EPYC 75F3 was $4874 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 7543 — making the EPYC 75F3 the 64.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | EPYC 7543 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383-48% | $10257 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0+97% | 6.1 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7543
