EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7702P

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8454H

32 Cores64 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7702P

64 / 128

63,692

+2.2%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8454H

32 / 64

62,347

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 83 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Costs $2,115 less on MSRP ($4,425 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 270W, a 70W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8454H moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8454H

2023

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (83 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (62,347 vs 63,692).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($6,540 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
❌35% higher power demand at 270W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7702P better than Xeon Platinum 8454H?

Yes. EPYC 7702P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7702P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 83 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 210.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7702P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7702P comes in $2,115 cheaper on MSRP at $4,425 MSRP versus $6,540 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.0% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8454H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7702P

The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

Xeon Platinum 8454H

The Xeon Platinum 8454H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 62,347 points. Launch price was $6,540.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — a 1.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8454H (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the Xeon Platinum 8454H's 62,347 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8454H.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.4 GHz+1%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+210%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	63,692+2%	62,347

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702P versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — the Xeon Platinum 8454H supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) — the EPYC 7702P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8454H).

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Socket	TR4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8454H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8454H rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7702P was priced at $4425, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H came in at $6540. On launch pricing ($4425 vs $6540), EPYC 7702P was $2115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8454H — making the EPYC 7702P the 40.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP	$4425-32%	$6540
Performance per Dollar	14.4+52%	9.5
Release Date	2019	2023

Search EPYC 7702P on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8454H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.