EPYC 7702P vs EPYC 9254
EPYC 7702P
EPYC 9254
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7702P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9254
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,425) | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+307%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,425) | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7702P and EPYC 9254
EPYC 7702P
The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.
EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9254 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 — a 21.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9254 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9254 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the EPYC 9254's 64,344 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 9254. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+167% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 4.15 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 63,692 | 64,344+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,233 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,023 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9254 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702P versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 — the EPYC 7702P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7702P) vs 12 (EPYC 9254). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and SP5 (EPYC 9254).
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144 GB+157286300% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9254 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9254). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7702P launched at $4425 MSRP, while the EPYC 9254 debuted at $3761.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4425 | $3761-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1099 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7702P and EPYC 9254
