Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs Core Ultra 5 225F
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Core Ultra 5 225F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+35%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Core Ultra 5 225F
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,251 points. Launch price was $499.
Core Ultra 5 225F
The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F — a 13% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225F (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 scores 31,251 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 31,541 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 17,050 (2.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,688 vs 2,653, a 44.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 13,028 (26.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225F). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+20% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.9 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+220% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 31,251 | 31,541 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500+3% | 17,050 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,688 | 2,653+57% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | 13,028+30% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225F — the Core Ultra 5 225F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core Ultra 5 225F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225F). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 targets Professional Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 rivals Core i9-10900.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225F debuted at $231. At current prices ($200 vs $150), the Core Ultra 5 225F is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 delivers 156.3 pts/$ vs 210.3 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225F — making the Core Ultra 5 225F the 29.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $231-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $150-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 156.3 | 210.3+35% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Core Ultra 5 225F
