
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs Xeon Gold 5320H

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

Xeon Gold 5320H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 5320H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cooper Lake-SP (2021) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5320H

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,251 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 5320H
The Xeon Gold 5320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 31,718 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5320H offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 5320H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5320H — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5320H uses Cooper Lake-SP (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 scores 31,251 against the Xeon Gold 5320H's 31,718 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 5320H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 22,000 (22.8% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5320H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,688 vs 1,350, a 22.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 11,000 (9.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5320H). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs 27.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5320H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 20 / 40+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+29% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+133% | 27.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 31,251 | 31,718+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500 | 22,000+26% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,688+25% | 1,350 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | 11,000+10% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5320H uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 5320H supports up to 1120 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 159% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5320H). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5320H) — the Xeon Gold 5320H offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) and C621A (Xeon Gold 5320H).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1120 GB+775% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 5320H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 5320H). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 targets Professional Content Creation, Xeon Gold 5320H targets High-density Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 rivals Core i9-10900; Xeon Gold 5320H rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation | High-density Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















