
Core i5-13600

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Core i5-13600 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13600 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13600 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $244 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 123.5 vs 62.6 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 21,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.6 vs 123.5 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600 better than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13600 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13600
The Core i5-13600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,499 points. Launch price was $255.


Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,251 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i5-13600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-13600 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13600 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600 scores 31,499 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900's 31,251 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-13600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 17,500 (18.2% advantage for the Core i5-13600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,900 vs 1,688, a 11.8% lead for the Core i5-13600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 10,000 (18.2% advantage for the Core i5-13600). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+16% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 31,499 | 31,251 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000+20% | 17,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900+13% | 1,688 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000+20% | 10,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13600 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 — the Core i5-13600 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) — the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i5-13600) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900).
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900). The Core i5-13600 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600 targets High-end Productivity Desktop, Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 targets Professional Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600 rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 rivals Core i9-10900.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Productivity Desktop | Professional Content Creation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13600 was priced at $255, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 came in at $499. On launch pricing ($255 vs $499), Core i5-13600 was $244 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600 delivers 123.5 pts/$ vs 62.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 — making the Core i5-13600 the 65.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $255-49% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 123.5+97% | 62.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













