Core i5-13600 vs Xeon E-2488

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13600 vs Xeon E-2488 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13600 vs Xeon E-2488: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13600

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E-2488 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2488.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Xeon E-2488 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2488

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 21,000).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13600.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600 better than Xeon E-2488?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2488 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 40% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600 is the better buy right now. Core i5-13600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $255 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (123.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-13600 vs Xeon E-2488 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13600

The Core i5-13600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,499 points. Launch price was $255.

Xeon E-2488

The Xeon E-2488 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 31,888 points. Launch price was $606.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E-2488 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-13600 versus 5.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2488 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2488 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600 scores 31,499 against the Xeon E-2488's 31,888 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E-2488. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 15,000 (33.3% advantage for the Core i5-13600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,900 vs 2,100, a 10% lead for the Xeon E-2488 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 12,000 (0% advantage for the Xeon E-2488). Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-13600	Xeon E-2488
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.2 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	31,499	31,888+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000+40%	15,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,900	2,100+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,000	12,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13600 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i5-13600) and W680 (Xeon E-2488).

Feature	Core i5-13600	Xeon E-2488
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-13600 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E-2488 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600 targets High-end Productivity Desktop, Xeon E-2488 targets Entry-level Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600 rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Xeon E-2488 rivals Xeon E-2388G.

Feature	Core i5-13600	Xeon E-2488
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	High-end Productivity Desktop	Entry-level Server / Workstation