
Core i5-13600

Core Ultra 5 225F
Core i5-13600 vs Core Ultra 5 225F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13600 vs Core Ultra 5 225F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13600 vs Core Ultra 5 225F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+23.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,900 vs 2,653).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 123.5 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
Core Ultra 5 225F
2025Why buy it
- ✅+39.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 123.5 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,050 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13600.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225F better than Core i5-13600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13600 vs Core Ultra 5 225F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13600
The Core i5-13600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,499 points. Launch price was $255.

Core Ultra 5 225F
The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core i5-13600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-13600 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600 scores 31,499 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 31,541 — a 0.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 17,050 (20.8% advantage for the Core i5-13600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,900 vs 2,653, a 33.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 13,028 (8.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225F). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+40% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+2% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+20% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+140% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 31,499 | 31,541 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000+23% | 17,050 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | 2,653+40% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | 13,028+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13600 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225F — the Core Ultra 5 225F supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225F) — the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i5-13600) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F).
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core Ultra 5 225F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225F). The Core i5-13600 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 5 225F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600 targets High-end Productivity Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600 rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Productivity Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13600 was priced at $255, while the Core Ultra 5 225F came in at $231. On launch pricing ($255 vs $231), Core Ultra 5 225F was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600 delivers 123.5 pts/$ vs 136.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225F — making the Core Ultra 5 225F the 10% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $255 | $231-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 123.5 | 136.5+11% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














