
Core i7-14700T

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Core i7-14700T vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-14700T vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-14700T vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-14700T
2024Why buy it
- β +61.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Costs $115 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- β Delivers 31.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.3 vs 62.6 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019Why buy it
- β +93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- β 20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,688 vs 2,723).
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 18,390).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 62.6 vs 82.3 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-14700T better than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-14700T vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-14700T
The Core i7-14700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,604 points. Launch price was $384.


Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017β2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,251 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-14700T packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Core i7-14700T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14700T versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 β a 18.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses Zen 2 (2017β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700T scores 31,604 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900's 31,251 β a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-14700T. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,723 vs 1,688, a 46.9% lead for the Core i7-14700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,390 vs 10,000 (59.1% advantage for the Core i7-14700T). L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700T vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
| Feature | Core i7-14700T | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 28+67% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+21% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+138% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 64 MB+94% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) | Zen 2 (2017β2020) |
| PassMark | 31,604+1% | 31,251 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 17,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,723+61% | 1,688 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,390+84% | 10,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-14700T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 β the Core i7-14700T supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-14700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700T) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) β the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700T) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900).
| Feature | Core i7-14700T | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900). The Core i7-14700T includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14700T targets Productivity, Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 targets Professional Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 rivals Core i9-10900.
| Feature | Core i7-14700T | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Productivity | Professional Content Creation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-14700T was priced at $384, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 came in at $499. On launch pricing ($384 vs $499), Core i7-14700T was $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14700T delivers 82.3 pts/$ vs 62.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 β making the Core i7-14700T the 27.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-14700T | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-23% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.3+31% | 62.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













