Core i7-14700T
VS
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Core i7-14700T vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Intel

Core i7-14700T

20 Cores28 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

8 Cores16 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-14700T

#222
Core i7-9800X
MSRP: $589|Avg: $210
105%
#223
Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $235
104%
#224
Ryzen 9 5900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $395
104%
#225
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
MSRP: $299|Avg: $300
104%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
64%
#226
Core i5-14500T
MSRP: $232|Avg: $267
104%
#227
Core i5-12600
MSRP: $233|Avg: $250
104%
#228
Core i7-11700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $180
104%
#229
Core i5-10600
MSRP: $244|Avg: $159
104%
#230
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
MSRP: $193|Avg: $100
104%
#231
Core i7-8700B
MSRP: $303|Avg: $139
103%
#232
Ryzen 3 2200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $80
102%
#233
Core i3-9100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $80
102%
#234
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
MSRP: $479|Avg: $479
101%
#235
Ryzen 9 3900XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $390
101%
#236
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
100%
#237
Core i7-14700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $384
100%
#238
Core i3-13100TE
MSRP: $137|Avg: $137
100%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
99%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
98%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
98%
#242
Celeron G6900E
MSRP: $53|Avg: $53
98%
#243
Core i3-12300T
MSRP: $209|Avg: $164
98%
#244
Core i9-12900
MSRP: $519|Avg: $420
97%
#245
Ryzen 3 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
97%
#246
Core i7-11700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $299
97%
#247
Core i5-10600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $179
97%
#248
Core i3-10325
MSRP: $154|Avg: $130
96%
#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
96%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
96%
#251
Core i3-10300T
MSRP: $157|Avg: $100
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
118%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
116%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
116%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
112%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
110%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
102%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
102%
#189
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-14700T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-14700TRyzen AI Max PRO 385
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($384)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-14700TRyzen AI Max PRO 385
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($384)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14700T and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Intel

Core i7-14700T

The Core i7-14700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,604 points. Launch price was $384.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700T packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-14700T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14700T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700T scores 31,604 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-14700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,723 vs 2,886, a 5.8% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,390 vs 14,136 (26.2% advantage for the Core i7-14700T). L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

FeatureCore i7-14700TRyzen AI Max PRO 385
Cores / Threads
20 / 28+150%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+4%
5 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz+177%
L3 Cache
33 MB (total)+3%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
31,604
31,508
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,723
2,886+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,390+30%
14,136
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-14700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700T) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700T) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).

FeatureCore i7-14700TRyzen AI Max PRO 385
Socket
LGA1700
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+50%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both include integrated graphics UHD 770 (Core i7-14700T) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14700T targets Productivity, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.

FeatureCore i7-14700TRyzen AI Max PRO 385
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 770
Radeon 8050S
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Productivity
Enterprise AI Mobile