PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-14700T vs Core Ultra 5 225F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-14700T vs Core Ultra 5 225F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-14700T

2024

Why buy it

✅+41.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+65% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225F.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 82.3 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).

Core Ultra 5 225F

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅Delivers 65.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 82.3 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,028 vs 18,390).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 33 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-14700T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225F better than Core i7-14700T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 225F is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700T pulls ahead with 41.2% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i7-14700T also has the bigger cache pool with 65% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 41.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 65% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 225F is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 225F comes in $153 cheaper on MSRP at $231 MSRP versus $384 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-14700T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 41.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 65.9% better value on MSRP (136.5 vs 82.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i7-14700T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-14700T vs Core Ultra 5 225F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-14700T

The Core i7-14700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,604 points. Launch price was $384.

Core Ultra 5 225F

The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700T packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core i7-14700T has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14700T versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700T scores 31,604 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 31,541 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-14700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,723 vs 2,653, a 2.6% lead for the Core i7-14700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,390 vs 13,028 (34.1% advantage for the Core i7-14700T). L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700T vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F.

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Core Ultra 5 225F
Cores / Threads	20 / 28+100%	10 / 10
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+6%	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.3 GHz+154%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)+65%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+50%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	31,604	31,541
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	17,050
Geekbench 6 Single	2,723+3%	2,653
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,390+41%	13,028

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700T versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225F — the Core Ultra 5 225F supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700T) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225F) — the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700T) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F).

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Core Ultra 5 225F
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core Ultra 5 225F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225F). The Core i7-14700T includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Core Ultra 5 225F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14700T targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Core Ultra 5 225F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD 770	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Productivity	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-14700T was priced at $384, while the Core Ultra 5 225F came in at $231. On launch pricing ($384 vs $231), Core Ultra 5 225F was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14700T delivers 82.3 pts/$ vs 136.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225F — making the Core Ultra 5 225F the 49.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP	$384	$231-40%
Performance per Dollar	82.3	136.5+66%
Release Date	2024	2025

Search Core i7-14700T on Amazon

Search Core Ultra 5 225F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.