Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs Core Ultra 7 265H
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Core Ultra 7 265H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Vermeer (2020−2025) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and Core Ultra 7 265H
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 34,549 points. Launch price was $499.
Core Ultra 7 265H
The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H — a 12% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265H (base: 3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 34,549 against the Core Ultra 7 265H's 34,702 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265H. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.3 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 4.5 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+167% | 24 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 34,549 | 34,702 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 23,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 versus 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs 28 (Core Ultra 7 265H) — the Core Ultra 7 265H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) and BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 8400+209900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core Ultra 7 265H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H). The Core Ultra 7 265H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T GPU), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 rivals Core i9-12900; Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Arc 140T GPU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and Core Ultra 7 265H
