Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
VS
Core Ultra 9 285H

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

16 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285H

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
121%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
112%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
102%
#40
Core Ultra 9 285H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
97%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 9 285H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 9 PRO 5945Core Ultra 9 285H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Vermeer (2020−2025) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 9 PRO 5945Core Ultra 9 285H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 34,549 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 34,549 against the Core Ultra 9 285H's 34,327 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 23,200 vs 26,500 (13.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,175 vs 2,720, a 22.3% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,500 vs 15,330 (20.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H.

FeatureRyzen 9 PRO 5945Core Ultra 9 285H
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
5.4 GHz+15%
Base Clock
3 GHz+3%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB+167%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+500%
Process
7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Vermeer (2020−2025)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
34,549
34,327
Cinebench R23 Multi
23,200
26,500+14%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,175
2,720+25%
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,500
15,330+23%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 versus LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285H — the Core Ultra 9 285H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) and SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H).

FeatureRyzen 9 PRO 5945Core Ultra 9 285H
Socket
AM4
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
192 GB+50%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H). The Core Ultra 9 285H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 targets High-end Gaming, Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 rivals Core i9-12900; Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

FeatureRyzen 9 PRO 5945Core Ultra 9 285H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V (SVM)
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Gaming
High-end Mobile Workstation