
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Xeon Gold 6146
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs Xeon Gold 6146 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs Xeon Gold 6146 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs Xeon Gold 6146: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 165W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon Gold 6146 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6146, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon Gold 6146
2017Why buy it
- ✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,595 vs 22,781).
- ❌371.4% higher power demand at 165W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS better than Xeon Gold 6146?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs Xeon Gold 6146 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6146
The Xeon Gold 6146 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 22,595 points. Launch price was $3,286.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6146 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6146 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6146 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6146 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS scores 22,781 against the Xeon Gold 6146's 22,595 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6146.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+17% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 24.75 MB+55% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+4167% | 12 MB |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 22,781 | 22,595 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,670 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,903 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,609 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6146 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6146). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Xeon Gold 6146 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












