Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,777 vs 22,781).
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS better than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700?

Yes. Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (69.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,777 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 22,777 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 3700	Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm	6 nm-14%
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark	22,777	22,781
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	14,670
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,903
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,609

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 3700	Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Socket	AM4	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 3700) / Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.