Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon W-1370

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1370

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon W-1370 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon W-1370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon W-1370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,777 vs 22,948).
  • 1.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $329 MSRPvs$323 MSRP

Xeon W-1370

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $6 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
  • 23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1370 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1370 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-1370 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1370 comes in $6 cheaper on MSRP at $323 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.6% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 69.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-1370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon W-1370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,777 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon W-1370 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 22,777 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-1370. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 3700Xeon W-1370
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+24%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB+100%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark
22,777
22,948
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 3700Xeon W-1370
Socket
AM4
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 was priced at $329, while the Xeon W-1370 came in at $323. On launch pricing ($329 vs $323), Xeon W-1370 was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 delivers 69.2 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1370 — making the Xeon W-1370 the 2.6% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 3700Xeon W-1370
MSRP
$329
$323-2%
Performance per Dollar
69.2
71.0+3%
Release Date
2019
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.