Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon Gold 6146

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6146

12 Cores24 Thrd165 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon Gold 6146 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon Gold 6146 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon Gold 6146: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

2019

Why buy it

  • +29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6146, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6146 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6146

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,595 vs 22,777).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
  • 153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 better than Xeon Gold 6146?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6146 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (69.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017), 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Xeon Gold 6146 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,777 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6146

The Xeon Gold 6146 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 22,595 points. Launch price was $3,286.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6146 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6146 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6146 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6146 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 22,777 against the Xeon Gold 6146's 22,595 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6146.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 3700Xeon Gold 6146
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+5%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+12%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB+29%
24.75 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
12 MB+2300%
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
22,777
22,595
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6146 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 3700Xeon Gold 6146
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0