Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Xeon E7-4830

Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Xeon E7-4830 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 5 340

6 / 12

19,776

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E7-4830

8 / 16

19,981

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Xeon E7-4830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Xeon E7-4830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 5 340

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1567 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-4830 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,776 vs 19,981).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4830, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E7-4830

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1567, while Ryzen AI 5 340 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-4830 better than Ryzen AI 5 340?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4830 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 5 340 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7-4830 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7-4830 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E7-4830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 5 340 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2011) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1567. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Xeon E7-4830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI 5 340

The Ryzen AI 5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,776 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-4830

The Xeon E7-4830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EX (2011) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 19,981 points. Launch price was $2,059.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 5 340 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-4830 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E7-4830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 340 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4830 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 340 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Ryzen AI 5 340 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses Westmere-EX (2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 19,776 against the Xeon E7-4830's 19,981 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E7-4830. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 340 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-4830.

Feature	Ryzen AI 5 340	Xeon E7-4830
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+100%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.13 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	8 MB	24 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-88%	32 nm
Architecture	Krackan Point (2025)	Westmere-EX (2011)
PassMark	19,776	19,981+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,696
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,382

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 5 340 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.