Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
VS
Core Ultra 7 256V

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Core Ultra 7 256V

AMD

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 256V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
105%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
101%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
100%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
96%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core Ultra 7 256V shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightRyzen AI 5 PRO 340Core Ultra 7 256V
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Krackan Point (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen AI 5 PRO 340Core Ultra 7 256V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 and Core Ultra 7 256V

AMD

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,469 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

The Core Ultra 7 256V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,579 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 256V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 256V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 256V — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 19,469 against the Core Ultra 7 256V's 19,579 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 256V.

FeatureRyzen AI 5 PRO 340Core Ultra 7 256V
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+150%
Process
4 nm
3 nm-25%
Architecture
Krackan Point (2025)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,469
19,579
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,065
Geekbench 6 Single
2,658
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen AI 5 PRO 340Core Ultra 7 256V
Socket
FP8
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340) / true (Core Ultra 7 256V). The Core Ultra 7 256V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 256V targets Mobile.

FeatureRyzen AI 5 PRO 340Core Ultra 7 256V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 256V debuted at $450. At current prices ($0 vs $350), the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is $350 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen AI 5 PRO 340Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP
$0-100%
$450
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$350
Performance per Dollar
55.9
Release Date
2025
2024