Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Xeon E-2386G

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Xeon E-2386G Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

6 / 12

19,469

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2386G

6 / 12

19,468

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Xeon E-2386G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Xeon E-2386G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

2025

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2386G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon E-2386G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,468 vs 19,469).
❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 better than Xeon E-2386G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2386G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs Xeon E-2386G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,469 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2386G

The Xeon E-2386G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 and Xeon E-2386G share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2386G — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2386G (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E-2386G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 19,469 against the Xeon E-2386G's 19,468 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2386G.

Feature	Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340	Xeon E-2386G
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	5.1 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	8 MB	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Krackan Point (2025)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	19,469	19,468

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2386G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.