
Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 230 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,469 vs 19,702).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 230 better than Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 PRO 230
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,469 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 scores 19,702 against the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340's 19,469 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+75% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 19,702+1% | 19,469 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,320 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,210 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses the FP7/FP7r2/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 was priced at $150, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($150 vs $0), Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 was $150 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 131.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













