
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,702 vs 19,889).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,702 vs 19,889).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 230?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 381 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 230's 19,702 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. Both processors carry 16 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,889 | 19,702 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,210 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220) / AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 debuted at $150. On MSRP ($0 vs $150), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $150 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 131.3 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











