Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

6 / 12

19,889

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2699 v3

18 / 36

20,028

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 145W, a 139W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,028).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌2316.7% higher power demand at 145W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Xeon E5-2699 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2699 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2014) and a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 20,028 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Xeon E5-2699 v3's 20,028 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E5-2699 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+36%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	45 MB (total)+181%
L2 Cache	6 MB	256K (per core)+4167%
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	19,889	20,028

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E5-2699 v3
Socket	FP7/FP7r2	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v3). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v3 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.