Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E7-4830

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E7-4830 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

6 / 12

19,889

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E7-4830

8 / 16

19,981

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E7-4830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E7-4830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 105W, a 99W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1567 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 19,981).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4830, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E7-4830

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1650% higher power demand at 105W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1567, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Xeon E7-4830?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4830 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2011) and a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5 instead of LGA1567. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E7-4830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-4830

The Xeon E7-4830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EX (2011) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 19,981 points. Launch price was $2,059.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-4830 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E7-4830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4830 — a 68.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses Westmere-EX (2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Xeon E7-4830's 19,981 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E7-4830. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-4830.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E7-4830
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+104%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+50%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	6 MB+2300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-88%	32 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)	Westmere-EX (2011)
PassMark	19,889	19,981
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,696
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,382

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E7-4830
Socket	FP7/FP7r2	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	2048 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	0