Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Core i9-10900F
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-10900F | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-10900F | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+99%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Core i9-10900F
The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900F packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900F (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-10900F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900F scores 19,800 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 230's 19,702 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10900F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,701 vs 2,320, a 30.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,456 vs 7,210 (15.9% advantage for the Core i9-10900F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230.
| Feature | Core i9-10900F | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 6 MB+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,800 | 19,702 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,701 | 2,320+36% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,456+17% | 7,210 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900F versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900F) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) — the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B460,H470,Z490,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i9-10900F) and Socket FP7 (Ryzen 5 PRO 230).
| Feature | Core i9-10900F | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900F) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Core i9-10900F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.
| Feature | Core i9-10900F | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10900F launched at $464 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 debuted at $150. At current prices ($300 vs $150), the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is $150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900F delivers 66.0 pts/$ vs 131.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 the 66.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900F | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $464 | $150-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.0 | 131.3+99% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 230
