Core i9-10900F
VS
Xeon E5-2699 v3

Core i9-10900F vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

Intel

Core i9-10900F

10 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2699 v3

18 Cores36 Thrd145 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900F

#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
107%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
44%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
43%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
106%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
106%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
105%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
42%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
105%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
104%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
42%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
104%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
104%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
102%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
101%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
33%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
100%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
100%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
100%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
100%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
100%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
25%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
22%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2699 v3

#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
122%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
122%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
118%
#35
Xeon E5-2699 v3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
93%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i9-10900F (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i9-10900FXeon E5-2699 v3
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i9-10900FXeon E5-2699 v3
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900F and Xeon E5-2699 v3

Intel

Core i9-10900F

The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2699 v3

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 20,028 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900F packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900F (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-10900F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900F scores 19,800 against the Xeon E5-2699 v3's 20,028 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v3. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699 v3.

FeatureCore i9-10900FXeon E5-2699 v3
Cores / Threads
10 / 20
18 / 36+80%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+42%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+22%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
45 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
19,800
20,028+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,701
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,456
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900F versus 2400 on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2699 v3 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 128 GB 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-10900F) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2699 v3). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900F) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2699 v3) — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B460,H470,Z490,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i9-10900F) and C612 (Xeon E5-2699 v3).

FeatureCore i9-10900FXeon E5-2699 v3
Socket
LGA1200
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
2400+59900%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+8738033%
1536
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
40+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X; Xeon E5-2699 v3 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.

FeatureCore i9-10900FXeon E5-2699 v3
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming