
Core i7-1370P

Core i9-10900F
Core i7-1370P vs Core i9-10900F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-1370P vs Core i9-10900F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-1370P vs Core i9-10900F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-1370P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $26 less on MSRP ($438 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,200 vs 13,500).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-10900F.
Core i9-10900F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1370P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌5.9% HIGHER MSRP$464 MSRPvs$438 MSRP
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-1370P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1370P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900F better than Core i7-1370P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-1370P vs Core i9-10900F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1370P
The Core i7-1370P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 19,993 points. Launch price was $438.

Core i9-10900F
The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1370P packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-10900F offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-1370P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-1370P versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-1370P (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-1370P uses the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10900F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1370P scores 19,993 against the Core i9-10900F's 19,800 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-1370P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,200 vs 13,500 (2.2% advantage for the Core i9-10900F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,701, a 16.2% lead for the Core i7-1370P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,095 vs 8,456 (17.7% advantage for the Core i7-1370P). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-1370P vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+40% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+2% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+20% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-P (2023) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,993 | 19,800 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,200 | 13,500+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000+18% | 1,701 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,095+19% | 8,456 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1370P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-10900F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i7-1370P versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900F — the Core i7-1370P supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-10900F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-1370P) vs 16 (Core i9-10900F) — the Core i7-1370P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-1370P) and B460,H470,Z490,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i9-10900F).
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+77% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 128 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-1370P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Core i9-10900F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1370P targets Workstation, Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-1370P rivals Ryzen 7 7840U; Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe 96EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-1370P was priced at $438, while the Core i9-10900F came in at $464. On launch pricing ($438 vs $464), Core i7-1370P was $26 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-1370P delivers 45.6 pts/$ vs 42.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900F — making the Core i7-1370P the 6.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $438-6% | $464 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.6+7% | 42.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














