Core i7-1370P vs Xeon E5-2686 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1370P vs Xeon E5-2686 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1370P vs Xeon E5-2686 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1370P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 145W, a 117W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Xeon E5-2686 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2686 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $438 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2686 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2686 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1370P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (6,822 vs 10,095).
❌417.9% higher power demand at 145W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i7-1370P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1370P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1370P better than Xeon E5-2686 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2686 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1370P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-1370P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1370P is the stronger fit. You are getting 48% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1370P is the better buy right now. Core i7-1370P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $438 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (45.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1370P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011-3, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 18/36. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-1370P vs Xeon E5-2686 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1370P

The Core i7-1370P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 19,993 points. Launch price was $438.

Xeon E5-2686 v4

The Xeon E5-2686 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,860 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1370P packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2686 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2686 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-1370P versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2686 v4 — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-1370P (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-1370P uses the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2686 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1370P scores 19,993 against the Xeon E5-2686 v4's 19,860 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-1370P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 895, a 76.3% lead for the Core i7-1370P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,095 vs 6,822 (38.7% advantage for the Core i7-1370P). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-1370P vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2686 v4.

Feature	Core i7-1370P	Xeon E5-2686 v4
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	18 / 36+29%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+73%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.3 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	45 MB+88%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	4.5 MB+125%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-P (2023)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	19,993	19,860
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,200	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000+123%	895
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,095+48%	6,822

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1370P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2686 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i7-1370P versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2686 v4 — the Core i7-1370P supports 116.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2686 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-1370P) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2686 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-1370P) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2686 v4) — the Xeon E5-2686 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-1370P) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2686 v4).

Feature	Core i7-1370P	Xeon E5-2686 v4
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCLGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+117%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	1536 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-1370P) vs Yes (Xeon E5-2686 v4). The Core i7-1370P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Xeon E5-2686 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1370P targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-1370P rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.